Anyone who watched Andy Murray in the recent US Open will acknowledge that he played some stunning tennis on the way to the final, and he is undoubtedly one of Britain's most talented young sportsmen.
So why don't the public like him?
Is it because he's a bit grumpy? Better that than the personality-less Tim Henman, who people adored. Are we so jingoistic that we won't warm to him because he's Scottish, rather than English? Being Canadian didn't stop people liking Greg Rusedski.
I just don't get it. He may be a tad sullen, but he's destined for great things... we Brits should get behind him...
But after a generation where our top sports performers have been taken in by their own publicity - Beckham, Flintoff, Hamed, O'Sullivan, all top performers in their sport yet big-headed morons - it's nice to have a newer generation who concentrate on their sport instead of the headlines.
Murray - like Stuart Broad in cricket, like Theo Walcott in football - is a talented performer who doesn't feel the need to court celebrity too. I admire that.
Well, he's still some way off being charismatic and humble, but I really can't fault Andy Murray's start to the new tennis season. He's been in imperious form, and really does look like a world beater.
I'm gonna stick my neck out early and predict - at last - a British triumph at Wimbledon in June...
So... another Grand Slam tourament where Andy Murray flatters to deceive in the early rounds, sees the draw open up in front of him with the exit of Rafael Nadal... and then he turns in an abject performance in the quarter finals to lose to an opponent who's decent enough, but who Murray really should be dispatching comfortably.
Which I think begs the question: Is Andy Murray in danger of becoming the new Tim Henman?
So... another Grand Slam tourament where Andy Murray flatters to deceive in the early rounds, sees the draw open up in front of him with the exit of Rafael Nadal... and then he turns in an abject performance in the quarter finals to lose to an opponent who's decent enough, but who Murray really should be dispatching comfortably.
Which I think begs the question: Is Andy Murray in danger of becoming the new Tim Henman?
If he consistently gets to the semi-finals at Wimbledon and then takes the eventual champion to 5-sets only to be defeated (which was what happened to Tim with Sampras and Goran) then I'd say "Well done Andy" if he did become the new Tim Henman.
We're so awful to our tennis players.
Sampras beat Tim in the 5th set one year, very exciting, and then on the Sunday he proceeded to completely blitz the other "finalist" and won in straight sets.
Had Tim been in the other half of the draw each time perhaps we'd have had a double Wimbledon Champion.
And Andy's doing okay - this fella was a Clay Court Specialist (Gonzales) - it's no crime to lose. Sport's like that.
I'm not saying he's useless. He's clearly a very talented young player. For my money, he's already better than Henman or Rusedski ever were.
That said, Britain is crying out for a Grand Slam winner and has been for years. Murray has made one final and lost, so did Rusedksi. Henman made a number of semi-finals, but never got beyond.
Did he bottle it? Was he just not quite good enough compared to the other top players of the day? Either way, it's clear he finished his career with a gaping hole in his sporting CV, and a label as something of a 'nearly man'.
All I'm asking is: As talented as Murray is, is he destined to always come up that little bit short in the way that Henman always did?
Joined on 06/07/2008
Kettering Northants
Posts 115
Re: Andy Murray
There is something about all British tennis players that I find
obnoxious,and I just don't know why.From Virginnia Wade to Henman and now Murray. The only one I have ever liked was Sue Barker.I will visit my psychiatrist soon!
Well, tempting though it is to say it was my fault Murray fell in the final for my kiss-of-death prediction, it's clear he still has a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooong way to go to compete with Federer... the man's just awesome.