Ha,ha Flyer,you should have posted that in the paranormal section here...you`re a mind reader.
And Sean,I remember paying to go on the pier in the sixties...an old sixpence I think for adults and an old threepenny piece for children. At a guess I would think that would be like paying a pound and 50p now...And I wouldn`t be surprised if that is the actual amount that will be charged when the pier properly reopens with new pavilion.
The fact that this idea is still being considered does, I suspect, mean that it will happen. If the Michaels were against the idea, I'm sure they'd have said so immediately and nipped this speculation in the bud.
While I am not thrilled to learn of this development, I suppose I can understand the thinking behind it.
(Apologies to Brum, incidentally, for my initial scepticism... clearly a forum user who's in the know...)
I don't really know why people would be worried about paying to go on the pier. The cost of getting on there would be offset, I would think, by free things once in. Just a different model, nothing better or worse.
Incidentally, I'm sure that if they did have a charging policy there'd also be "season tickets" or whatever, so for a relatively small sum you could go on there every day of the year should that be your wish.
Why should we pay to go on there, yes we know its a business that has to make money, but surely the money that is spent on the pier will surely provide this, and DID provide profit beforehand.
I wont be taking my family on there, as it will be too expensive as the little ones will still want to go on the rides etc, so i sahall go elsewhere and spend my money elsewhere.
Anyone know if they got the insurance payment yet? Have the police closed their files? soz to be so slow if they have, I try to ignore the news on the pier.
Deputy chief fire officer Jerry O'Brien said: "Taking into consideration evidence provided by eye witnesses CCTV images, firefighters and a detailed scene examination, the cause of this fire will therefore officially be recorded as unknown."
He said the most likely cause was "an electrical fault of unknown origin above ground floor level in the north east corner of the Pavilion - where the fire started but the investigation did not provide enough evidence for this to be a conclusive finding."
Mr O'Brien said the fire service may have had a better chance of defeating the blaze if an alarm triggered at 0135 BST was brought to its attention.
"The alarm - which went off five hours before the service was alerted - was connected to an alarm monitoring company which failed to contact Avon Fire and Rescue Service."
So I guess we will never know what started the fire but since the results haven't pointed to arson I would guess the insurance payout has now come through.
It would be interesting to hear the alarm monitoring company's side of the story. Most alarm monitoring companies would want to "pass the parcel" as quickly as possible. Insurance companies would want their liability to be reduced to 01.35 BST levels, rather than 5 hour later damage levels. Some Insurance companies might be minded to say, " there was a 5 hour delay in fighting the fire, sorry, all bets off. " It depends on the Insurance Policy small print terms and conditions.
But did they own an Insurance company? In the press, it has been previously mentioned that they were Insurance Brokers, admittedly of a substantial size, not Insurance company owners.
To be honest, I didn't think there were any 'private individual owned' Insurance companies left in the UK. There are wealthy 'names' in Lloyds of London who are very large investors as part of Insurance syndicates, but they are one of many members. If a 'name' insured a valuable item, which they owned, in their own syndicate, and a claim was made, which perhaps proved to be contentious. Then the other member 'names' might want the claimant to "take that claim on the chin"!
i think you all had better get used to the fact that the pier has a private owner, it does not belong to the town and will be run as a business to make a profit. most attractions these days have an entrance fee, you all know this to be true, so i am very surprised at your surprise.. ,Maybe , as a future , if enough people vote for him, local politician Mr Bell, can shed some light on this. After all , did he not ask us all to get behind kerry and his sister from the letters page of the mercury?,,, regards furbs
And the Michaels are, I believe, brokers - not an insurance company. There are very few of them. The casual observer might think there are loads, but when you look into it further you'll find there's very few insurance companies at all... brands? yes - but you'd be surprised how many are actually the same company underneath.
I wouldn't mind paying to go on the Grand Pier at all if it offered things I couldn't do elsewhere.