Birnbeck plans compared to Alcatraz

Birnbeck Presentation Birnbeck Presentation

Monday, November 11, 2013
10:00 AM

PROPOSED villas on Birnbeck Island have been described as an ‘eyesore’ and likened to Alcatraz prison.

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

Wahid Samady exclusively revealed his vision to resurrect Birnbeck Pier in last week’s Mercury, with 15-20 villas on the island and about 170 flats jutting out from the mainland.

However his plans have been heavily criticised by his former business partner, a councillor and the majority of Mercury readers.

Mr Samady said the scale of development is necessary to generate £10million profit which would pay for the pier’s repair and his design would help put the town back on the map.

Cllr John Crockford-Hawley was shown the plans months ago by Mr Samady but he had to promise not to reveal them to the public in return.

He said: “For more than two decades we’ve seen one ridiculous scheme follow another.

“While any successful business at the pier will be dependent upon income generation I’m afraid this Samady plan would create an eyesore of such enormity that the historic pier itself would sink into architectural oblivion.”

Jim Scott, Mr Samady’s former business partner and joint-owner of the former Royal Pier Hotel, was equally critical.

He said: “The island development seems to have been draw up by the same architect who designed Alcatraz.

“Maybe it could be used as a prison when nobody buys what will be overpriced luxury apartments in the middle of the murky Bristol Channel and the three fingers on stilts idea seems to have been cobbled together to resemble a Vietnamese fishing village.”

An online poll run on the Mercury website showed 47 per cent of readers were in favour of Mr Samady’s proposal. But comments left online and posted on the Mercury’s Facebook page were almost unanimously critical.

Messages described Mr Samady’s vision as ‘pie in the sky’, ‘disgusting’ and a ‘monstrosity’.

Concerns over whether there would be enough parking - despite Mr Samady saying the bottom floor of each block of flats would have room for vehicles - and accessibility for emergency vehicles were also raised.

Cllr Crockford-Hawley added: “There is only one way forward and that is for the pier to pass into charitable hands with substantial Heritage Lottery Fund involvement.

“The alternative lies in the muddy depths below.”

5 comments

  • The plans show some car parking space on the landside. But don't show the access to the parking levels. Will it be by car lifts ? Mega expensive, and what if the lift breaks down. Or will it be by spiral car ramps ? This would take up a lot of space, plus all the space required to park say, 170 cars, in the three jutting out buildings. That's say, 55 cars each block, plus the space to manoeuvre around amongst the parked cars. Then, there's the 15 to 20 villas on the Island. Where are they going to park ? The Grand Pier has a two ton weight limit on it's Pier. When it caught fire, the fire engines (8 to 10 tons) all had to park on the road (it's the wooden planks that can't take all that weight on such a small tyre footprint). Even if the Birnbeck Pier was built as strong as the Grand Pier, there are many cars and especially 4x4s that weigh 2 tons or more. How would you fancy parking your car landside, and walking 300 yards across the Pier in tonight's drizzle and murk, to your luxury villa ? Sorry, Mr Samady might obtain planning permission, but his plans will never come to fruition.

    Report this comment

    Stork

    Monday, November 11, 2013

  • Snappy comeback :-) - not too sure I'd want to live there; after the initial attraction had worn off, the island isolation effect would kick-in - depressing after a while, except for, maybe, 2 months in the year? Better it's USP is all year round attractions, TBD?

    Report this comment

    Mukiwa

    Monday, November 11, 2013

  • Who owns the shore line for the 3 blocks of flats?

    Report this comment

    Westonman

    Monday, November 11, 2013

  • Censored again, can Archant publish those words that is regards as libellous - beats me why my submission was sent into cyberspace, never to be seen again?

    Report this comment

    Mukiwa

    Monday, November 11, 2013

  • Maybe the place to relocate our more troublesome residents ?

    Report this comment

    Chris White

    Monday, November 11, 2013

The views expressed in the above comments do not necessarily reflect the views of this site

Family notices Advertise Your Letters Competitions Reader travel iwitness24 Facebook Twitter


Join our newsletter

Local Search 24 – North Somerset
Looking for a:

Location:

Search radius:

North Somerset's trusted business directory