Appeal for 46 homes on waterlogged site gets go-ahead
- Credit: Archant
A total of 46 new homes will be built on a Somerset site that is ‘often waterlogged’ according to a planning inspector, who ruled other factors outweighed the flood risk.
Flower & Hayes Ltd originally applied to build 47 homes on land north of the B3139 at Walrow – plans which were refused by Sedgemoor District Council in March 2019.
The developer subsequently reduced the number of homes by one, submitting fresh plans and lodging an appeal against the council’s decision.
The Planning Inspectorate has now confirmed the development of 46 homes will go ahead following the appeal – which the council voted not to contest.
The council’s development committee voted in June that it would not defend any appeal made on the site.
Councillor Tony Bradford said at the time: “We’re stuck between a rock and a hard place. We’ve got a gun to our heads here – the worst position to be in.
“We all need housing, and we’re going to have a lot more developments thrown at us in the next six months. We have to make the best of what we can get.”
- 1 7 rescue pets looking for forever homes this Christmas in Somerset
- 2 Christmas lights switch-on and festivities announced for Weston
- 3 What are the chances of a white Christmas in Somerset?
- 4 Strong winds expected across Somerset this weekend
- 5 Charity ball raises thousands for Cancer Research
- 6 Man sentenced to at least 24 years for trying to kill his parents
- 7 Castle Batch monument uncovered
- 8 Weston pub attracts crowds for Christmas light switch on
- 9 Tributes paid to 'bright, beautiful, gentle soul' who died after being found injured
- 10 Weston RAF Association to host Cooking with Heroes book launch
Planning inspector Matthew Bale visited the Walrow site on July 21, and published his findings ahead of a development committee meeting on Tuesday (October 13).
He said: “Although the dwellings would not have the same appearance or form as Walrow Terrace or other historic cottages in the area, I find that the current proposal would be compatible with its surroundings, which includes other residential development and is generally urban in character.”
Mr Bale acknowledged local evidence that the site was ‘often waterlogged’ and that much of Highbridge remained at risk of flooding.
However, he ruled that the site’s proximity to local amenities meant the benefits of providing new houses outweighed the potential flood risk.
He said: “The site is in an accessible location within easy walking distance of many services and facilities, and has public transport connections to locations further afield. I find that wider sustainability benefits exist that outweigh the flood risk.”
Mr Bale added there was ‘no substantive evidence’ the development would harm motorists or pedestrians – despite local reports regarding traffic levels and crashes near the railway bridge.